Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
6 results
Oct 21, 2024In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: raydium_ts_i2c - fix memory leak in raydium_i2c_send() There is a kmemleak when tesCVE-2022-48995 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67Medium 5.5
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: raydium_ts_i2c - fix memory leak in raydium_i2c_send() There is a kmemleak when test the raydium_i2c_ts with bpf mock device: unreferenced object 0xffff88812d3675a0 (size 8): comm "python3", pid 349, jiffies 4294741067 (age 95.695s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 11 0e 10 c0 01 00 04 00 ........ backtrace: [<0000000068427125>] __kmalloc+0x46/0x1b0 [<0000000090180f91>] raydium_i2c_send+0xd4/0x2bf [raydium_i2c_ts] [<000000006e631aee>] raydium_i2c_initialize.cold+0xbc/0x3e4 [raydium_i2c_ts] [<00000000dc6fcf38>] raydium_i2c_probe+0x3cd/0x6bc [raydium_i2c_ts] [<00000000a310de16>] i2c_device_probe+0x651/0x680 [<00000000f5a96bf3>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0 [<00000000096ba499>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170 [<00000000c5acb4d9>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120 [<00000000264fe082>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150 [<00000000f919423c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180 [<00000000e067feca>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0 [<0000000054301fc2>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140 [<00000000aad93b22>] device_add+0x810
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
May 16, 2006Multiple buffer overflows in Raydium before SVN revision 310 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large packet when logged via (1) the raydiumCVE-2006-2408 · Other software · Raydium · reported by MITREHigh 7.5
Multiple buffer overflows in Raydium before SVN revision 310 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large packet when logged via (1) the raydium_log function in log.c or (2) the raydium_console_line_add function in console.c, possibly from a long player name.
- Product
- Raydium
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaluigi.altervista.orgraydium.org
May 16, 2006Format string vulnerability in the raydium_log function in console.c in Raydium before SVN revision 310 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via format CVE-2006-2409 · Other software · Raydium · reported by MITREMedium 4.6
Format string vulnerability in the raydium_log function in console.c in Raydium before SVN revision 310 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the format parameter, which are not properly handled in a call to raydium_console_line_add.
- Product
- Raydium
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaluigi.altervista.orgraydium.org
May 16, 2006raydium_network_netcall_exec function in network.c in Raydium SVN revision 312 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application craCVE-2006-2410 · Other software · Raydium · reported by MITREMedium 5
raydium_network_netcall_exec function in network.c in Raydium SVN revision 312 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a packet of type 0xFF, which causes a null dereference.
- Product
- Raydium
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaluigi.altervista.orgsecunia.com
May 16, 2006Buffer overflow in raydium_network_read function in network.c in Raydium SVN revision 312 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sendiCVE-2006-2411 · Other software · Raydium · reported by MITREHigh 7.5
Buffer overflow in raydium_network_read function in network.c in Raydium SVN revision 312 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending packets with long global variables to the client.
- Product
- Raydium
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaluigi.altervista.orgsecunia.com
May 16, 2006The raydium_network_read function in network.c in Raydium SVN revision 312 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) CVE-2006-2412 · Other software · Raydium · reported by MITREMedium 5
The raydium_network_read function in network.c in Raydium SVN revision 312 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a large ID, which causes an invalid memory access (buffer over-read).
- Product
- Raydium
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaluigi.altervista.orgsecunia.com
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.