Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
9 results
Aug 7, 2026Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Revenue Administration Türkiye's E-Signature allows Server Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-16027 · Other software · Revenue Administration · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trMedium 5.4
Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Revenue Administration Türkiye's E-Signature allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Türkiye's E-Signature: from 2.4.4.0 before 2.5.1.0.
- Product
- E-Signature
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 2, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP inline-signature policy failures silently ignored.CVE-2026-59643 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP inline-signature policy failures silently ignored. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 2.0.13.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 30, 2021Tor before 0.3.5.16, 0.4.5.10, and 0.4.6.7 mishandles the relationship between batch-signature verification and single-signature verification, leading to a remoCVE-2021-38385 · Other software · Torproject · reported by MITREHigh 7.5
Tor before 0.3.5.16, 0.4.5.10, and 0.4.6.7 mishandles the relationship between batch-signature verification and single-signature verification, leading to a remote assertion failure, aka TROVE-2021-007.
- Product
- TOR
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordblog.torproject.orgblog.torproject.org
Jul 21, 2021Vulnerability in the Oracle E-Records product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: E-signatures).CVE-2021-2393 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comHigh 8.1
Vulnerability in the Oracle E-Records product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: E-signatures). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1-12.1.3 and 12.2.3-12.2.10. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle E-Records. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle E-Records accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle E-Records accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
- Product
- E-Records
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Nov 29, 2019The PGP signature parsing in Module::Signature before 0.74 allows remote attackers to cause the unsigned portion of a SIGNATURE file to be treated as the signedCVE-2015-3406 · Other software · Module-signature Project · reported by MITREHigh 7.5
The PGP signature parsing in Module::Signature before 0.74 allows remote attackers to cause the unsigned portion of a SIGNATURE file to be treated as the signed portion via unspecified vectors.
- Product
- Module-signature
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordubuntu.comopenwall.com
Nov 19, 2019Node-cookie-signature before 1.0.6 is affected by a timing attack due to the type of comparison used.CVE-2016-1000236 · Other software · Cookie-signature Project · reported by MITREMedium 4.4
Node-cookie-signature before 1.0.6 is affected by a timing attack due to the type of comparison used.
- Product
- Cookie-signature
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordbugs.debian.orgbugzilla.redhat.com
Oct 3, 2019REDCap before 9.3.4 has XSS on the Customize & Manage Locking/E-signatures page via Lock Record Custom Text values.CVE-2019-17121 · Other software · Vanderbilt · reported by MITREMedium 5.4
REDCap before 9.3.4 has XSS on the Customize & Manage Locking/E-signatures page via Lock Record Custom Text values.
- Product
- Redcap
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
May 19, 2015Untrusted search path vulnerability in Module::Signature before 0.75 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse module under the current working dCVE-2015-3409 · Other software · Module-signature Project · reported by MITREHigh 7.2
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Module::Signature before 0.75 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse module under the current working directory, as demonstrated by a Trojan horse Text::Diff module.
- Product
- Module-signature
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
May 19, 2015Module::Signature before 0.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands via a crafted SIGNATURE file which is not properly handled when generaCVE-2015-3408 · Other software · Module-signature Project · reported by MITREHigh 10
Module::Signature before 0.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands via a crafted SIGNATURE file which is not properly handled when generating checksums from a signed manifest.
- Product
- Module-signature
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.