Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
9,162 results · page 8 of 184
Sep 24, 2026Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer: Blind Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-18335 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.4
The Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.0 via the 'kirki_data' Parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
- Product
- Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer
- Affected
- up to 6.2.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 6.2.0. Update Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgwordfence.com
Sep 23, 2026A server-side request forgery flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller email notification backend.CVE-2026-84721 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatMedium 6.4
A server-side request forgery flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller email notification backend. The email backend passes the user-supplied SMTP host and port from a notification template directly to the SMTP client without validating that the target is not an internal, loopback, link-local, or reserved address. An authenticated user with organization notification-admin permission can create or modify an email notification template pointing at an arbitrary internal address, trigger a test, and have the controller task process open a raw TCP connection to that address. The resulting connection error is reflected back through the notification record, providing a three-state internal port-scan oracle (open, closed, filtered) over the control-plane's cluster network, including the in-cluster Kubernetes API. When a shared organization template holds a stored SMTP password, redirecting the host can also cause that credential to be transmitted to an attacker-controlled server.
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaccess.redhat.comaccess.redhat.com
Sep 23, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Capabilities <= 2.50.1 versions.CVE-2026-94487 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Capabilities <= 2.50.1 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.50.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.50.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 23, 2026Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) VulnerabilityCVE-2026-96655 · Other software · Plex · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725ExploitedMedium 5.3
Plex Media Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow an authenticated user to request arbitrary internal or external addresses via the '/video/:/transcode/universal' path parameter. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96652, CVE-2026-96654, and CVE-2026-96656.
- Product
- Media Server
- On CISA’s list since
- Oct 20, 2026 (federal fix deadline Nov 3, 2026)
- What to do
- Attackers are using this now. Install Plex’s update today. If there is no update for your version, take the product off the internet or stop using it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordCISA catalogforums.plex.tvraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 23, 2026Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) VulnerabilityCVE-2026-96652 · Other software · Plex · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725ExploitedMedium 5.3
Plex Media Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability which could allow an attacker using any X-Plex-Token value to include a full URL in the 'protocol' parameter and force the Plex server to POST to the attacker's chosen destination. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96654, CVE-2026-96655, and CVE-2026-96656.
- Product
- Media Server
- On CISA’s list since
- Oct 20, 2026 (federal fix deadline Nov 3, 2026)
- What to do
- Attackers are using this now. Install Plex’s update today. If there is no update for your version, take the product off the internet or stop using it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordCISA catalogforums.plex.tvraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 23, 2026Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Global IT Informatics Technology Services Inc.CVE-2026-77112 · Other software · Global IT Informatics Technology Services Inc. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trMedium 6.5
Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Global IT Informatics Technology Services Inc. Weoll allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Weoll: before 3.2.45.44.
- Product
- Weoll
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authenticatioCVE-2026-18153 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 5.4
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authentication tags due to the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys and initialization vectors.
- Product
- Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of crypCVE-2026-18152 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.4
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures.
- Product
- Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-16426 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 6.5
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
- Product
- Concert
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the notebook viewer of GitHub Enterprise Server.CVE-2026-77987 · Other software · GitHub · reported by product-cna@github.comCritical 9.3
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the notebook viewer of GitHub Enterprise Server. The notebook viewer validated the scheme and host of a user-supplied URL but did not validate the port, allowing requests to be directed to internal services listening on other ports of the same appliance. Response bodies were not returned to the requester, but response timing acted as an oracle that allowed instance secrets to be extracted character by character. An extracted secret could then be used in a separate interaction with an internal service to obtain remote code execution on the appliance. Exploitation required network access to the instance and was unauthenticated when private mode was disabled, or required any authenticated user when private mode was enabled. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server versions 3.17 through 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.22.1, 3.21.6, 3.20.8, 3.19.12, 3.18.15, and 3.17.21. This vulnerability was reported through the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
- Product
- Enterprise Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recorddocs.github.comdocs.github.com
Sep 22, 2026Premiere Pro is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation potentially resulting in unauthorized wCVE-2026-84395 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 7.1
Premiere Pro is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation potentially resulting in unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- Premiere
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-82000 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.6
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- AEM 6.5 Forms JEE
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-81999 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 8.7
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- AEM 6.5 Forms JEE
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass.CVE-2026-75743 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 7.1
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page.
- Product
- AEM 6.5 Forms JEE
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-83660 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.9
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- Adobe Campaign Classic
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-82443 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.6
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- Adobe Campaign Classic
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-82013 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.9
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- Adobe Campaign Classic
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 21, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the serverRequest function of nocobase v2.1.21 allows authenticated attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted HCVE-2026-88403 · Other software · reported by MITREMedium 6.5
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the serverRequest function of nocobase v2.1.21 allows authenticated attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted HTTP request.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 21, 2026CuteNews v.2.1.2 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in core/modules/media.php -- upload_from_inet (Media Manager's "Upload by URL" functionalitCVE-2026-36469 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
CuteNews v.2.1.2 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in core/modules/media.php -- upload_from_inet (Media Manager's "Upload by URL" functionality).
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 19, 2026Wow Elements Addons for Elementor: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-1641 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 6.5
The Wow Elements Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.11.2. This is due to the plugin passing user-controlled input from the 'Changelog File' setting directly to the wp_remote_get function without adequate validation or sanitization of the URL. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
- Product
- Wow Elements Addons for Elementor
- Affected
- up to 1.11.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.11.2. Update Wow Elements Addons for Elementor to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Sep 18, 2026Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages.CVE-2026-93873 · Other software · Cotonti · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages. Attackers can auto-submit contact forms from attacker-controlled pages to send forged messages attributed to authenticated victims to the administrator inbox.
- Product
- Cotonti
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the ratings plugin AJAX handler, allowing attackers to forge ratings on behalf of authenticated userCVE-2026-93870 · Other software · Cotonti · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the ratings plugin AJAX handler, allowing attackers to forge ratings on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious pages that auto-submit POST requests to modify stored rating data when visited by logged-in users.
- Product
- Cotonti
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-84084 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.CVE-2026-84077 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026A vulnerability was identified in Forget-C Jellyfish AI Short Drama Studio 0.1.0-alpha/0.2.0/0.3.0/0.3.1/0.3.2.CVE-2026-93559 · Other software · Forget-C · reported by VulDBMedium 6.9
A vulnerability was identified in Forget-C Jellyfish AI Short Drama Studio 0.1.0-alpha/0.2.0/0.3.0/0.3.1/0.3.2. This affects an unknown function of the file backend/app/dependencies.py of the component FastAPI. The manipulation leads to missing authentication. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.
- Product
- Jellyfish AI Short Drama Studio
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026IBM Common Licensing Agent 9.0, Agent 9.0.0.1, Agent 9.0.0.2, ART 9.0, ART 9.0.0.1, and ART 9.0.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could alloCVE-2025-15399 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 10
IBM Common Licensing Agent 9.0, Agent 9.0.0.1, Agent 9.0.0.2, ART 9.0, ART 9.0.0.1, and ART 9.0.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
- Product
- Common Licensing
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PersonMail API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-CVE-2026-40537 · Network & remote access · Synology · reported by security@synology.comMedium 4.3
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PersonMail API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
- Product
- DiskStation Manager (DSM)
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 18, 2026HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its search functionality, which could allow an attacker to foCVE-2026-67101 · Other software · HCL Software · reported by psirt@hcl.comCritical 9.3
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its search functionality, which could allow an attacker to force the application server to send requests to internal systems that are not accessible from the internet.
- Product
- HCL BigFix Service Management
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordsupport.hcl-software.com
Sep 18, 2026Auto Upload Images: Limited Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-12106 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 6.4
The Auto Upload Images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Limited Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2 via the downloadImage function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application. The plugin uses wp_remote_get() rather than wp_safe_remote_get(), and the validate() method only rejects URLs whose host matches the site's own hostname, failing to block requests to private, loopback, or link-local addresses (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 10.0.0.0/8, 169.254.169.254). Attackers can trigger this by embedding a crafted <img> tag with a src attribute pointing to internal network hosts in post content and submitting it for processing.
- Product
- Auto Upload Images
- Affected
- up to 3.3.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.3.2. Update Auto Upload Images to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Sep 17, 2026django-page-cms through 2.0.13 exempts five admin mutation views from CSRF protection in pages/admin/views.py, allowing attackers to forge requests that modify CVE-2026-93456 · Other software · batiste · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
django-page-cms through 2.0.13 exempts five admin mutation views from CSRF protection in pages/admin/views.py, allowing attackers to forge requests that modify page content. Signed-in editors visiting a malicious page can be tricked into storing unescaped content that renders to all visitors, enabling stored cross-site scripting attacks.
- Product
- django-page-cms
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 17, 2026Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.CVE-2026-85917 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.5
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
- Product
- Azure AI Foundry
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 17, 2026Server-side request forgery in Omnibox in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass sCVE-2026-93384 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comLow 3.7
Server-side request forgery in Omnibox in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
- Product
- Chrome
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordchromereleases.googleblog.comissues.chromium.org
Sep 17, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm-integrity: replace forgeable discard filler with a keyed sector marker The discard-blocCVE-2026-90333 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm-integrity: replace forgeable discard filler with a keyed sector marker The discard-block check in dm_integrity_rw_tag() treats a stored tag of all 0xf6 bytes (DISCARD_FILLER) as proof a block was discarded and skips HMAC verification. allow_discards is only accepted in dm-integrity's standalone mode. An attacker with raw write access to the backing device, but without the integrity key, can stamp any block with an all-0xf6 tag and have it served as authentic. Add a new "allow_discards_keyed" target argument that marks discarded blocks with a keyed checksum of (salt || sector) instead, computed by integrity_discard_checksum().
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Sep 17, 2026Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.3, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-81446 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comHigh 7.4
Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.3, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
- Product
- OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node (Patch) for Windows
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 17, 2026Improper Output Neutralization for Logs vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge application log entries by sCVE-2026-86522 · Other software · team-alembic · reported by 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49dbMedium 6.3
Improper Output Neutralization for Logs vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge application log entries by submitting a password reset identity containing newlines or control characters. AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.RequestPasswordReset.run/3 interpolates the identity argument, the email or username taken straight from the reset request, into its Logger.warning/1 heredocs without escaping, truncating or type-restricting it. The resource logged beside it is passed through inspect/1, which would have neutralized the value. A newline in the identity therefore ends the log record, and everything after it is written as a line of its own, so an attacker chooses the severity tag and the content of entries that appear to have come from the application. This issue affects ash_authentication: from 4.2.0 before 4.15.0 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.14.
- Product
- ash_authentication
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcna.erlef.orggithub.com
Sep 17, 2026Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.3, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-81443 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.4
Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.3, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
- Product
- OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node (Patch) for Windows
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 17, 2026Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.3, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-80355 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 5.4
Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.3, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution.
- Product
- OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node (Patch) for Windows
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 17, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Xagio SEO <= 7.1.0.43 versions.CVE-2026-78295 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Xagio SEO <= 7.1.0.43 versions.
- Affected
- up to 7.1.0.43
- What to do
- Affects up to 7.1.0.43. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 17, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Series <= 3.1.3 versions.CVE-2026-74005 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Series <= 3.1.3 versions.
- Affected
- up to 3.1.3
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.1.3. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 17, 2026Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) <= 2.0.19 versions.CVE-2026-66608 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.4
Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) <= 2.0.19 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.0.19
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.0.19. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 17, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster <= 1.4.0.5 versions.CVE-2026-66571 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster <= 1.4.0.5 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.4.0.5
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.4.0.5. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 16, 2026AVideo (WWBN/AVideo) through 29.0 (commit e01e41ecc) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery.CVE-2026-92582 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
AVideo (WWBN/AVideo) through 29.0 (commit e01e41ecc) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. objects/videoAddNew.json.php disables AVideo's automatic CSRF guard ($global['skipAutoCSRFCheck']) and the untrusted-request check ($global['bypassSameDomainCheck']) merely because 'user' and 'pass' parameters are present in the request; the values are never validated and are read from $_REQUEST, so an attacker can supply them in the query string of a cross-site request. Because User::loginFromRequestIfNotLogged() returns immediately when a session already exists, a victim who is authenticated by cookie satisfies the check while the attacker-supplied credentials are discarded. An attacker who lures an authenticated user with upload rights to visit a crafted page can therefore submit cross-origin requests that modify video records — including ownership transfer (setUsers_id), deletion of user-group access restrictions, can_download, can_share, only_for_paid, video_password, rating, status, creation date, and view count. For a victim with administrator or Permissions::canAdminVideos() rights, any video on the site can be altered, including removing group restrictions from private content
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 16, 2026HKUDS nanobot before 0.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the WebFetchTool component where the _validate_url() function fails to block CVE-2026-92576 · Other software · HKUDS · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.2
HKUDS nanobot before 0.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the WebFetchTool component where the _validate_url() function fails to block internal IP ranges and private addresses. Attackers can send messages instructing the bot to fetch cloud metadata endpoints, localhost services, and RFC 1918 addresses to extract IAM credentials and internal service data.
- Product
- nanobot
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 16, 2026phpList versions before 3.6.17 fail to validate cross-site request forgery tokens in the mass subscriber removal form handler.CVE-2026-92806 · Websites & servers · phpList · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
phpList versions before 3.6.17 fail to validate cross-site request forgery tokens in the mass subscriber removal form handler. Attackers can induce logged-in administrators to visit crafted pages that silently delete and blacklist arbitrary subscriber addresses without authentication verification.
- Product
- phpList
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026Wiki.js through 2.5.314 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Image Prefetch renderer that fetches arbitrary URLs without protocol, host, CVE-2026-92775 · Other software · requarks · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
Wiki.js through 2.5.314 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Image Prefetch renderer that fetches arbitrary URLs without protocol, host, or address validation. Attackers with page editing permissions can inject img elements with the prefetch-candidate class to make the server request internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, with responses returned to the attacker.
- Product
- Wiki.js
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026CMAK through 3.0.0.6 fails to install a cross-site request forgery filter, allowing attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authenticated operaCVE-2026-92751 · Other software · yahoo · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
CMAK through 3.0.0.6 fails to install a cross-site request forgery filter, allowing attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authenticated operators. Attackers can craft hidden forms that submit to destructive endpoints like topic deletion and cluster configuration changes, leveraging the operator's HTTP Basic authentication credentials or play-basic-authentication cookie without SameSite protection.
- Product
- CMAK
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability exists in sat_proxy.php in Zenith Satellite Tracker 1.0.CVE-2025-56563 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.8
A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability exists in sat_proxy.php in Zenith Satellite Tracker 1.0. The script accepts an attacker-controlled address URL parameter and passes it to curl_setopt(CURLOPT_URL) without host or scheme validation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can leverage this to make arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests from the server to internal networks or cloud metadata services, potentially obtaining sensitive information or pivoting to further attacks.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the UnifiedLogin service of Altium Enterprise Server.CVE-2026-92808 · Other software · Altium · reported by 4760f414-e1ae-4ff1-bdad-c7a9c3538b79Critical 10
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the UnifiedLogin service of Altium Enterprise Server. An unauthenticated network attacker can cause the server to issue outbound HTTP requests to a destination of the attacker's choosing, including internal services that are reachable only from the server itself. One such internal service exposes server configuration and credential material without authentication, relying only on the request originating locally. Because the forged requests originate from the server process, that check is satisfied. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore retrieve stored credentials and use them to obtain an administrative session, resulting in full compromise of the server and all of its services. Altium 365 cloud deployments are not affected, as the affected endpoint is disabled in cloud mode.
- Product
- Altium Enterprise Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026kkFileView >= 4.2.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-88592 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
kkFileView >= 4.2.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The cross-origin file proxy endpoint /getCorsFile is protected by TrustHostFilter against the trust.host whitelist. However, the URL parameter validated by the filter is not the same parameter the controller actually fetches: the filter validates the first non-empty parameter in a fixed priority order, while the controller only reads and fetches urlPath. By supplying both urlPath=<real target> and url=<whitelisted decoy address> in the same request, the decoy passes validation while the unvalidated real target is fetched server-side — and the response body is echoed back to the attacker.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026Tanium addressed a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Threat Response.CVE-2026-87116 · Other software · Tanium · reported by 3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512Medium 6.5
Tanium addressed a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Threat Response.
- Product
- Threat Response
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.