Critical security advisoryCriticalFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is on CISA’s exploited list. Most WordPress hosting runs PHP. See if your site is affectedFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is being exploited. DetailsExploited: PHP2Shell. Check your site
HuttenlocherTechnologies
Updated 8 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,764exploited flaws on CISA’s list
35added in the last 30 days
456new WordPress flaws this week
390,714entries in the database

13,040 results · page 6 of 261

  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbCVE-2026-113231 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Browser in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox CVE-2026-113230 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Browser in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in FullScreen in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbCVE-2026-113214 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in FullScreen in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandboCVE-2026-113195 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a craCVE-2026-113175 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in UI in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside theCVE-2026-113173 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in UI in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Actor in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox viCVE-2026-113162 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Actor in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in WebShare in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandboxCVE-2026-113147 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in WebShare in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Media in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox viCVE-2026-113120 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Media in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in ANGLE in Google Chrome on on Mac prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the CVE-2026-113117 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in ANGLE in Google Chrome on on Mac prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Omnibox in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code insidCVE-2026-113099 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Omnibox in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in PrintPreview in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the saCVE-2026-113089 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Improper input validation in PrintPreview in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Input in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox viCVE-2026-113086 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Input in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sanCVE-2026-113084 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Improper input validation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sanCVE-2026-113078 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Improper input validation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Chromoting in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbCVE-2026-113063 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Chromoting in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in API in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via CVE-2026-113062 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in API in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Bluetooth in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandboCVE-2026-113060 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Bluetooth in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Passwords in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandboCVE-2026-113046 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Passwords in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Proxy in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox viCVE-2026-113040 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Proxy in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandCVE-2026-113023 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Improper input validation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Date in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox viCVE-2026-113020 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Improper input validation in Date in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbCVE-2026-113016 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Improper input validation in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via CVE-2026-113012 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Improper input validation in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026libcurl's TFTP state machine fails to validate state transitions against the requested transfer direction, accepting opening server responses for both reads andCVE-2026-92389 · Other software · curl · reported by 2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9

    libcurl's TFTP state machine fails to validate state transitions against the requested transfer direction, accepting opening server responses for both reads and writes interchangeably. A malicious TFTP server can respond to a download request in a way that forces the client into transmit mode, prompting libcurl to consume and transmit data from the handle's persistent `CURLOPT_READDATA` pointer - including data remaining from unrelated prior operations, such as an HTTP POST request executed on a reused handle.

    Product
    curl
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026When built with wolfSSL, curl can successfully validate a pinned public key hash against a key the TLS peer does not possess.CVE-2026-87866 · Other software · curl · reported by 2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9Critical 9.1

    When built with wolfSSL, curl can successfully validate a pinned public key hash against a key the TLS peer does not possess. During the TLS handshake, wolfSSL validates the connection, but curl's subsequent re-parsing of the same certificate - tricked by a manipulated validity length field - extracts and matches a different embedded key, incorrectly authorizing the pinned public key.

    Product
    curl
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026When libcurl uses libssh2 with a hashed `known_hosts` file, an unrelated initial entry can cause host key validation to report a key *mismatch* as a *missing* kCVE-2026-87865 · Other software · curl · reported by 2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9

    When libcurl uses libssh2 with a hashed `known_hosts` file, an unrelated initial entry can cause host key validation to report a key *mismatch* as a *missing* key to the `CURLOPT_SSH_KEYFUNCTION` callback.

    Product
    curl
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026The PEAK-System PCAN type 0x4030 processing path fails to validate a selected/returned object pointer before dereferencing fixed fields during post-processing.CVE-2026-110322 · Other software · HMS Networks · reported by ics-cert@hq.dhs.govMedium 6.8

    The PEAK-System PCAN type 0x4030 processing path fails to validate a selected/returned object pointer before dereferencing fixed fields during post-processing.

    Product
    PEAK-System Device Driver Setup
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026The PEAK-System PCAN diagnostic call did not validate that the caller-supplied output buffer was large enough to hold the output record.CVE-2026-101103 · Other software · HMS Networks · reported by ics-cert@hq.dhs.govMedium 6.8

    The PEAK-System PCAN diagnostic call did not validate that the caller-supplied output buffer was large enough to hold the output record.

    Product
    PEAK-System Device Driver Setup
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026The Cortex-A7 MMU Modules port validates a caller-supplied buffer by translating **one address** — the first byte.CVE-2026-95109 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgHigh 8.5

    The Cortex-A7 MMU Modules port validates a caller-supplied buffer by translating **one address** — the first byte. The common Module Manager hands its range check the module instance, the start address and the complete byte size; the Cortex-A7 implementation discarded the instance and the size and asked the MMU a single question about the start. A memory-protected module therefore passed any range whose first byte was user-readable, however far the rest of it reached. Privileged dispatch code then read or wrote the whole range. Because every protected-module dispatcher that consumes a buffer or an extra-parameter array goes through this one macro, the defect is not in any individual service: it is in the primitive all of them rely on.

    Product
    Eclipse ThreadX
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026The Module Manager's object lookup validated one byte of a memory-protected module's search name and then walked as much of it as the module declared, in privilCVE-2026-94024 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgMedium 6.9

    The Module Manager's object lookup validated one byte of a memory-protected module's search name and then walked as much of it as the module declared, in privileged mode, with the kernel's preemption count raised. Both lookup dispatchers are affected: the recommended `txm_module_object_pointer_get_extended` is handed a length and does not use it to bound the buffer, and the deprecated `txm_module_object_pointer_get` supplies the largest value a `UINT` can hold, so it removes the bound rather than lacking one. A module can make the walk unbounded without knowing anything about the memory it reaches, and where the walk reaches memory a privileged read cannot take, the resulting fault leaves the kernel unable to preempt for the rest of the system's life. Vulnerable functions: `_txm_module_manager_txm_module_object_pointer_get_dispatch`, `_txm_module_manager_txm_module_object_pointer_get_extended_dispatch` (both in `common_modules/module_manager/inc/txm_module_manager_dispatch.h`) and `_txm_module_manager_object_name_compare` (`common_modules/module_manager/src/txm_module_manager_util.c`).

    Product
    Eclipse ThreadX
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026An unvalidated runtime configuration value in Apache CouchDB 3.5.2 and below on all platforms allows a CouchDB server admin to run arbitrary shell commands as tCVE-2026-86471 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.3

    An unvalidated runtime configuration value in Apache CouchDB 3.5.2 and below on all platforms allows a CouchDB server admin to run arbitrary shell commands as the CouchDB operating system user. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.5.3, which fixes this issue.

    Product
    Apache CouchDB
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Stirling-PDF from 2.13.2 through 3.2.0 contains an incomplete denylist in DatabaseService.validateSqlContent() that allows administrators to bypass H2 import reCVE-2026-113605 · Other software · Stirling-Tools · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.6

    Stirling-PDF from 2.13.2 through 3.2.0 contains an incomplete denylist in DatabaseService.validateSqlContent() that allows administrators to bypass H2 import restrictions using CREATE OR REPLACE ALIAS. Authenticated administrators can upload a crafted SQL backup to the import-database endpoint, where RUNSCRIPT defines H2 Java function aliases and restores Java-method execution.

    Product
    Stirling-PDF
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Ghidra 10.2 through 12.1.4 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the ELF loader's ElfHeader class that allocates arrays sized by unvalidated extended seCVE-2026-113604 · Other software · NationalSecurityAgency · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.8

    Ghidra 10.2 through 12.1.4 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the ELF loader's ElfHeader class that allocates arrays sized by unvalidated extended section and program header counts. Attackers can supply a crafted 128-byte ELF file that triggers an OutOfMemoryError during load-spec discovery at import or in headless analysis pipelines.

    Product
    ghidra
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026json-smart through 2.6.0 contains an input validation bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to evade strict-mode trailing-data checks by inserting a literaCVE-2026-113602 · Other software · json-smart · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    json-smart through 2.6.0 contains an input validation bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to evade strict-mode trailing-data checks by inserting a literal 0x1A character. Attackers can append 0x1A and malformed content to pass JSONValue.parseStrict or isValidJsonStrict validation, creating parser differentials with downstream parsers like Jackson or Gson.

    Product
    json-smart
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026The Azure Key Vault KMS provider in Kroxylicious accepts an untrusted vaultName from wire-deserialized EDEK bytes without format validation, enabling SSRF that CVE-2026-105941 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 8.1

    The Azure Key Vault KMS provider in Kroxylicious accepts an untrusted vaultName from wire-deserialized EDEK bytes without format validation, enabling SSRF that exfiltrates the proxy's Azure bearer token to an attacker-controlled host. Token replay against the real Key Vault defeats the entire record-encryption trust model.

    Product
    streams for Apache Kafka 3
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Pass-through of unvalidated KMS URLs to KMS clients in Apache C++ Parquet and PyArrow versions 4.0.0 to 25.0.1.CVE-2026-92287 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.1

    Pass-through of unvalidated KMS URLs to KMS clients in Apache C++ Parquet and PyArrow versions 4.0.0 to 25.0.1. This affects users who read Parquet files and configure Parquet decryption properties with a KmsClient implementation. On the reader side, the KMS URL can be application-controlled (specified in the KmsConnectionConfig) or file-controlled. If the user does not leverage application control for this parameter, a file-controlled KMS URL is forwarded to a pluggable KmsClient implementation. If the KMS implementation does not perform host validation and makes use of the provided KMS URL, a KMS token can be sent to a malicious host set by an attacker in the file.  Users are recommended to upgrade to version 26.0.0, which disables this behavior by default and requires that users opt-in to it by enabling the read_kms_url flag in the DecryptionConfiguration. Users of affected versions are recommended to either specify the KMS URL in the KmsConnectionConfig when reading files, or ensure any KmsClient implementations validate received KMS URLs. Users that opt-in to file-controlled KMS URLs in version 26.0.0 and later must ensure KmsClients validate KMS URLs.

    Product
    Apache Arrow C++
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in FacturaScripts, version 2025.61, caused by a lack of adequate validation or sanitisation of user input in the ‘city’ and ‘pCVE-2026-11959 · Other software · FacturaScripts · reported by cve-coordination@incibe.esMedium 6.9

    Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in FacturaScripts, version 2025.61, caused by a lack of adequate validation or sanitisation of user input in the ‘city’ and ‘province’ fields in the ‘ListAlmacen’ endpoint. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim’s browser (the application user) or to escalate privileges from a normal user to an administrator by executing specially crafted JavaScript code, thereby compromising the system’s confidentiality or hijacking the session (even with httpOnly cookies by extracting CSRF tokens).

    Product
    FacturaScripts
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026The RemoteUserStoreManagerService does not sufficiently validate password change attempts when the password history validation feature is enabled.CVE-2024-2323 · Other software · WSO2 · reported by ed10eef1-636d-4fbe-9993-6890dfa878f8Medium 4.8

    The RemoteUserStoreManagerService does not sufficiently validate password change attempts when the password history validation feature is enabled. This oversight allows an attacker to repeatedly attempt password guesses for a user account without being adequately restricted. Exploiting this vulnerability enables an attacker to discover a user's password through brute force, leading to account impersonation. The success rate of such an attack is influenced by the complexity of the targeted user's password, with simpler passwords increasing the likelihood of compromise.

    Product
    WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026A denial-of-service issue was addressed with improved input validation.CVE-2026-86963 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comMedium 5.9

    A denial-of-service issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to cause a denial-of-service.

    Product
    iOS and iPadOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026A race condition was addressed with additional validation.CVE-2026-86961 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comHigh 7.8

    A race condition was addressed with additional validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27. A malicious app may be able to break out of its sandbox.

    Product
    iOS and iPadOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026An input validation issue was addressed with improved input validation.CVE-2026-86959 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.com

    An input validation issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. Processing a maliciously crafted image may lead to unexpected process termination.

    Product
    iOS and iPadOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026This issue was addressed by enforcing library validation on the affected binaries.CVE-2026-86949 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comHigh 8.8

    This issue was addressed by enforcing library validation on the affected binaries. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27. A malicious app may be able to break out of its sandbox.

    Product
    Xcode
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026This issue was addressed by enforcing library validation on the affected binaries.CVE-2026-86948 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comHigh 8.8

    This issue was addressed by enforcing library validation on the affected binaries. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox.

    Product
    Xcode
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026A path handling issue was addressed with improved validation.CVE-2026-86928 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comMedium 5.5

    A path handling issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27. An app may be able to access protected user data.

    Product
    macOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation.CVE-2026-86921 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comMedium 6.2

    A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, visionOS 27. A local attacker may be able to overwrite restricted files.

    Product
    iOS and iPadOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026A stack overflow was addressed with improved input validation.CVE-2026-86919 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comHigh 8.8

    A stack overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, visionOS 27. An attacker with a paired Bluetooth device may be able to execute arbitrary code.

    Product
    iOS and iPadOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026An input validation issue was addressed with improved input validation.CVE-2026-86875 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comMedium 4.3

    An input validation issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27. Parsing a maliciously crafted binary may lead to unexpected app termination.

    Product
    Xcode
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation.CVE-2026-86874 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comLow 3.3

    An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27. Parsing a maliciously crafted binary may lead to unexpected tool termination.

    Product
    Xcode
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026An integer underflow was addressed with improved input validation.CVE-2026-86871 · Computers, phones & browsers · Apple · reported by product-security@apple.comMedium 5.9

    An integer underflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker with control of a network file server may be able to cause unexpected system termination.

    Product
    macOS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get in touch

Tell us what you're building.

A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.

01The person who'll do the work writes back
02A short call, then a written plan with the price
03Nothing starts until you say yes
04Hacked or down right now? Call, and we pick up the same day
843-331-6339

Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.

What do you need?
Build
Grow
Protect
Urgent

No newsletter, no sales sequence. Just a reply.