Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
272 results · page 2 of 6
Sep 16, 2026Jenkins Gitee Plugin 1301.v8957053c7902 and earlier does not escape the sender name from Gitee push webhook payloads in build causes, resulting in a stored crosCVE-2026-92140 · Websites & servers · Jenkins Project · reported by jenkinsci-cert@googlegroups.comMedium 6.8
Jenkins Gitee Plugin 1301.v8957053c7902 and earlier does not escape the sender name from Gitee push webhook payloads in build causes, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to trigger builds via the Jenkins Gitee Plugin webhook endpoint.
- Product
- Jenkins Gitee Plugin
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 16, 2026Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin 4.0.1 and earlier trusts values provided in the webhook payload, including certain URLs, and uses configured BitbCVE-2026-92139 · Websites & servers · Jenkins Project · reported by jenkinsci-cert@googlegroups.comMedium 6.5
Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin 4.0.1 and earlier trusts values provided in the webhook payload, including certain URLs, and uses configured Bitbucket credentials to connect to those URLs, allowing attackers to capture Bitbucket credentials stored in Jenkins by sending a crafted webhook payload.
- Product
- Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 15, 2026webhookd is a minimalist webhook server that triggers shell scripts and external processes through HTTP requests.CVE-2026-59157 · Other software · ncarlier · reported by GitHubMedium 6.5
webhookd is a minimalist webhook server that triggers shell scripts and external processes through HTTP requests. Prior to 1.22.0, webhookd deployments without htpasswd authentication forwarded all incoming HTTP headers through HTTPParamsToShellVars in pkg/api/index.go into the hook script environment without an allowlist. When an upstream reverse proxy did not strip a client-supplied X-WebAuthn-User header and a hook script trusted that variable for identity or privilege, a remote unauthenticated attacker could spoof another user, bypass script security controls, and access or modify resources available to the impersonated identity. This issue is fixed in version 1.22.0.
- Product
- webhookd
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 14, 2026webhook through 2.8.3 reads the entire request body into memory before evaluating trigger rules, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust memory by sendingCVE-2026-91080 · Other software · adnanh · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
webhook through 2.8.3 reads the entire request body into memory before evaluating trigger rules, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust memory by sending oversized bodies. Attackers can send multi-gigabyte request bodies with invalid signatures to trigger out-of-memory conditions and crash the service.
- Product
- webhook
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 14, 2026Mattermost versions 11.9.x <= 11.9.0, 11.8.x <= 11.8.4, 11.7.x <= 11.7.7, 10.11.x <= 10.11.22 fail to validate null entries in Microsoft Graph webhook notificatCVE-2026-10556 · Other software · Mattermost · reported by responsibledisclosure@mattermost.comMedium 5.3
Mattermost versions 11.9.x <= 11.9.0, 11.8.x <= 11.8.4, 11.7.x <= 11.7.7, 10.11.x <= 10.11.22 fail to validate null entries in Microsoft Graph webhook notification payloads, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash the Microsoft Calendar plugin process and deny calendar integration service to all users on the instance via a crafted {{POST}} request to the public webhook endpoint.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00693
- Product
- Mattermost
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 8, 2026XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a payment replay vulnerability in the PayPal REST payment provider that allows attackers to process the same webhook payload multCVE-2026-73316 · Other software · XenForo · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a payment replay vulnerability in the PayPal REST payment provider that allows attackers to process the same webhook payload multiple times by exploiting a missing duplicate transaction ID check. Attackers can replay a valid webhook payload to trigger duplicate payment events, resulting in repeated subscription activations and unauthorized account upgrades.
- Product
- XenForo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordbombobombone.github.iogithub.com
Sep 8, 2026XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the PayPal REST webhook handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to cause theCVE-2026-73315 · Other software · XenForo · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.7
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the PayPal REST webhook handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to cause the server to make outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations by supplying a crafted certificate URL in webhook headers without scheme, hostname, or allowlist validation. Attackers can submit a crafted POST to the PayPal webhook callback endpoint to reach internal network resources including cloud instance metadata services, potentially disclosing IAM credentials or enabling secondary internal service exploitation.
- Product
- XenForo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordbombobombone.github.iogithub.com
Sep 8, 2026XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a signature verification logic error in the PayPal REST webhook handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass payment sCVE-2026-73314 · Other software · XenForo · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a signature verification logic error in the PayPal REST webhook handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass payment signature validation by submitting a webhook request with an unsupported auth_algo header value. When the algorithm cannot be mapped to a supported hash function, the verification function incorrectly returns true instead of failing, causing the caller to treat the fabricated request as verified and process the payment event without a valid PayPal signature.
- Product
- XenForo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordbombobombone.github.iogithub.com
Sep 7, 2026In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 the generic VCS webhook handler failed open when its secret was blankCVE-2026-86486 · Other software · JetBrains · reported by cve@jetbrains.comLow 3.7
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 the generic VCS webhook handler failed open when its secret was blank
- Product
- YouTrack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 7, 2026In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 iP spoofing via HTTP headers allowed forged Bitbucket webhooksCVE-2026-86485 · Other software · JetBrains · reported by cve@jetbrains.comLow 3.3
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 iP spoofing via HTTP headers allowed forged Bitbucket webhooks
- Product
- YouTrack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 5, 2026Rowboat through 0.9.1 fails to validate custom MCP server and webhook URLs, allowing authenticated users to configure arbitrary destinations.CVE-2026-86122 · Other software · rowboatlabs · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Rowboat through 0.9.1 fails to validate custom MCP server and webhook URLs, allowing authenticated users to configure arbitrary destinations. Attackers can point these URLs at internal services and cloud metadata endpoints to perform server-side request forgery and enumerate internal network topology.
- Product
- rowboat
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 4, 2026An issue in Invoice Ninja v5.13.24 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the StoreWebhookRequest.php, UpdateWebhookRequest.php, and WebhoCVE-2026-71626 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 7.5
An issue in Invoice Ninja v5.13.24 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the StoreWebhookRequest.php, UpdateWebhookRequest.php, and WebhookSingle.php components
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcolorful-quill-4fe.notion.sitecolorful-quill-4fe.notion.site
Sep 4, 2026xiaobei through 5.5.2 fails to implement authentication or signature validation on webhook endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary mesCVE-2026-85667 · Other software · TeamWiseFlow · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
xiaobei through 5.5.2 fails to implement authentication or signature validation on webhook endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary messages into the agent pipeline. Attackers can publish malicious messages via the /webhook_worktool handler and exploit unvalidated media URL fetching to perform server-side request forgery against internal services.
- Product
- xiaobei
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 4, 2026Trigger.dev before 4.5.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in webhook alert channel delivery URLs that are fetched without validation or SSRFCVE-2026-85650 · Other software · triggerdotdev · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Trigger.dev before 4.5.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in webhook alert channel delivery URLs that are fetched without validation or SSRF protection. Authenticated users with organization membership can create alert channels with URLs targeting internal services and metadata endpoints, allowing the server to issue POST requests to restricted resources.
- Product
- trigger.dev
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 4, 2026LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters.CVE-2026-85621 · Other software · lobehub · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner's agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender.
- Product
- lobehub
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 4, 2026Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-80181 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.1
Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue affects Apache Allura: through 1.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Allura
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orgopenwall.com
Sep 3, 2026Label Studio through 1.23.0 fails to validate webhook URLs, allowing authenticated users to dispatch requests to internal services including RFC 1918 addresses CVE-2026-85179 · Other software · HumanSignal · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
Label Studio through 1.23.0 fails to validate webhook URLs, allowing authenticated users to dispatch requests to internal services including RFC 1918 addresses and cloud metadata endpoints. Attackers can create webhooks targeting private networks and exfiltrate annotation data by enabling payload transmission in outbound requests.
- Product
- label-studio
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 3, 2026The API Publisher component previously used a non-cryptographic pseudorandom number generator (PRNG) to create shared secrets for Webhook HMAC validation.CVE-2026-3416 · Other software · WSO2 · reported by ed10eef1-636d-4fbe-9993-6890dfa878f8Medium 5.9
The API Publisher component previously used a non-cryptographic pseudorandom number generator (PRNG) to create shared secrets for Webhook HMAC validation. This PRNG lacks sufficient entropy for security-sensitive operations, allowing a sophisticated attacker to predict future secrets. This enables malicious actors to forge event payloads with valid HMAC signatures, bypassing the API Gateway's authenticity verification. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to predict shared secrets used for Webhook HMAC validation and forge event payloads with valid signatures. This may enable bypassing API Gateway authenticity checks, leading to unauthorized event injection, data manipulation, or downstream system compromise.
- Product
- WSO2 API Manager
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordsecurity.docs.wso2.com
Aug 31, 2026Devtron through 2.2.0 fails to enforce authorization checks on the GET /orchestrator/api-token/webhook endpoint, allowing authenticated users to retrieve admin CVE-2026-82882 · Other software · devtron-labs · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Devtron through 2.2.0 fails to enforce authorization checks on the GET /orchestrator/api-token/webhook endpoint, allowing authenticated users to retrieve admin API tokens. Attackers with any authenticated account can query the endpoint with arbitrary project, environment, and application parameters to retrieve plaintext super-admin JWT tokens for full platform control.
- Product
- devtron
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitivCVE-2026-9491 · Network & remote access · Synology · reported by security@synology.comMedium 4.3
A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
- Product
- Synology Chat Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 26, 2026Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in Spring Spring Cloud Config allows Webhook requests to Spring Cloud Config Server's /monitor endpoiCVE-2026-47837 · Other software · Spring · reported by security@vmware.comMedium 6.8
Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in Spring Spring Cloud Config allows Webhook requests to Spring Cloud Config Server's /monitor endpoint are not validated. This issue affects Spring Cloud Config: from 5.0.0 through 5.0.4, from 4.3.0 through 4.3.4, from 4.0.0 through 4.2.8, and through 3.1.14.
- Product
- Spring Cloud Config
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 26, 2026OneUptime's webhook target check rejects private and loopback addresses given in IPv4 form and a small set of IPv6 forms, but has no case for the IPv4-mapped IPCVE-2026-80350 · Other software · OneUptime · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
OneUptime's webhook target check rejects private and loopback addresses given in IPv4 form and a small set of IPv6 forms, but has no case for the IPv4-mapped IPv6 range. The webhook delivery path calls SSRFProtection.validateWebhookTargetIsSafe, and the host-literal screening inside Common/Server/Utils/SSRFProtection.ts, performed by isBlockedHostnameLiteral, rejects private and loopback IPv4 ranges and tests an IPv6 value against the unspecified address, the loopback, the link-local prefix and the unique-local prefixes. A value such as [::ffff:127.0.0.1] matches none of them. The value is also recognised as an address literal rather than a name, so the path that re-checks addresses obtained from resolution is not taken. The HTTP client treats the mapped form as the embedded IPv4 address and connects to it, so an authenticated project member who can configure a webhook can direct the server at loopback services, private network ranges and link-local metadata endpoints, and the response is recorded where the webhook result can be read. Version 12.0.7 adds handling for the mapped range.
- Product
- OneUptime
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 25, 2026Ech0 before 4.4.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the validateWebhookURL function (webhook_setting_service.go), which only validates litCVE-2026-79671 · Other software · lin-snow · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
Ech0 before 4.4.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the validateWebhookURL function (webhook_setting_service.go), which only validates literal IP addresses via net.ParseIP() and fails to reject hostnames that DNS-resolve to private or internal IPs (e.g., 169.254.169.254.nip.io). An attacker with admin privileges can create a webhook with such a hostname to bypass validation and cause the server to make requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and private network resources. The issue is fixed in 4.4.3.
- Product
- Ech0
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 24, 2026Grav API plugin before 1.0.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in webhook delivery that allows attackers to bypass hostname validation by DNCVE-2026-56708 · Other software · getgrav · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Grav API plugin before 1.0.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in webhook delivery that allows attackers to bypass hostname validation by DNS rebinding. Attackers controlling authoritative DNS for a configured webhook hostname can answer validation lookups with public addresses and delivery lookups with private addresses to reach internal network resources.
- Product
- grav
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 24, 2026Hi.Events validates a webhook destination only when it is registered, never when it is used.CVE-2026-76838 · Other software · HiEventsDev · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
Hi.Events validates a webhook destination only when it is registered, never when it is used. NoInternalUrlRule in backend/app/Validators/Rules/NoInternalUrlRule.php resolves the hostname with gethostbyname() and rejects private and reserved ranges, which any public hostname passes. At dispatch, WebhookDispatchService takes the stored URL and calls it through spatie/laravel-webhook-server without repeating the check, and backend/config/webhook-server.php sets no Guzzle options, so redirect following remains enabled by default. A destination that answers with a redirect to a loopback, private or cloud metadata address therefore causes the server to issue that request, and changing the hostname's DNS record after registration reaches the same result because no resolution is repeated. The response is not discarded: WebhookResponseHandlerService stores the body on the webhook log and WebhookLogResource returns it from the webhook logs endpoint, so the requester reads what the internal service replied rather than inferring it. Both event and organizer webhooks share the rule and the dispatch path. Version 1.11.1-beta revalidates at dispatch, pins the validated address, checks every redir
- Product
- Hi.Events
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 24, 2026Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Notification Master – Real-Time WordPress Notifications With Email, SMS, Webhooks & More <= 1.7.1 versions.CVE-2026-28153 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.5
Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Notification Master – Real-Time WordPress Notifications With Email, SMS, Webhooks & More <= 1.7.1 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.7.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.7.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 22, 2026Conekta Payment Gateway: Does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment gateway webhook notificationsCVE-2026-16738 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 5.3
The Conekta Payment Gateway WordPress plugin before 6.2.2 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment gateway webhook notifications, nor bind the confirmed payment to the targeted order or verify its amount, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary orders as paid without payment.
- Product
- Conekta Payment Gateway
- Fixed in
- 6.2.2
- What to do
- Update Conekta Payment Gateway to 6.2.2 or newer.
Aug 22, 2026AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in: Authorization bypassCVE-2026-76074 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.3
The AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 5.8.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve the site's configured Campaign Monitor mailing list catalog, including all list IDs and names, that should be restricted to users with the plugin's manager capability. The required nonce is emitted unconditionally on every WordPress admin page via wp_localize_script, meaning any subscriber visiting /wp-admin/profile.php can obtain it without any elevated access.
- Product
- AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in
- Affected
- up to 5.8.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 5.8.4. Update AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Aug 22, 2026AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in: Authorization bypassCVE-2026-76057 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.3
The AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 5.8.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve all ConvertKit form data configured by the site's manager account, exposing integration details intended to be restricted to plugin managers. The required nonce is localized on every admin page load, making it accessible to any authenticated user who can reach /wp-admin.
- Product
- AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in
- Affected
- up to 5.8.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 5.8.4. Update AutomatorWP – Automator plugin for no-code automations, webhooks & custom integrations in to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Aug 21, 2026Atlantis is a self-hosted golang application that listens for Terraform pull request events via webhooks.CVE-2026-64679 · Other software · runatlantis · reported by GitHubHigh 8.1
Atlantis is a self-hosted golang application that listens for Terraform pull request events via webhooks. From 0.19.8 until 0.45.0, Atlantis does not consistently validate user-controlled workspace values supplied through accepted repository-level atlantis.yaml configuration or authenticated /api/plan input before joining them into local workspace paths. Traversal segments can escape the intended per-pull workspace directory and cause clone preparation or other working-directory code paths to call os.RemoveAll, os.MkdirAll, or related filesystem operations on out-of-bounds directories before Terraform rejects the invalid workspace name. This can create, delete, or reuse writable paths with the privileges of the Atlantis process, causing integrity loss or denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 0.45.0.
- Product
- atlantis
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 21, 2026Charitable: Does not verify the authenticity of incoming Square payment webhook events in a default configurationCVE-2026-16650 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 5.3
The Charitable WordPress plugin before 1.8.12 does not verify the authenticity of incoming Square payment webhook events in a default configuration, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge webhook notifications that mark donations as paid without any real payment.
- Product
- Charitable
- Fixed in
- 1.8.12
- What to do
- Update Charitable to 1.8.12 or newer.
Aug 21, 2026Eventin: Does not validate a user-supplied webhook URL stored on events nor verify event ownershipCVE-2026-13176 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanLow 2.7
The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.21 does not validate a user-supplied webhook URL stored on events nor verify event ownership, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to trigger blind server-side requests to arbitrary hosts.
- Product
- Eventin
- Fixed in
- 4.1.21
- What to do
- Update Eventin to 4.1.21 or newer.
Aug 21, 2026Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's Webhook module while listing and deleting deliveries.CVE-2026-65613 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgMedium 4.3
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's Webhook module while listing and deleting deliveries. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.20.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache CloudStack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 21, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's webhook module, exploitable via webhook delivery requests.CVE-2026-59085 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's webhook module, exploitable via webhook delivery requests. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.20.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache CloudStack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 20, 2026Lightdash stores the webhook URL supplied with a scheduled delivery and later posts to it from sendWebhook in packages/backend/src/clients/GoogleChat/GoogleChatCVE-2026-72846 · Other software · lightdash · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Lightdash stores the webhook URL supplied with a scheduled delivery and later posts to it from sendWebhook in packages/backend/src/clients/GoogleChat/GoogleChatClient.ts and in packages/backend/src/clients/MicrosoftTeams/MicrosoftTeamsClient.ts. In affected versions both call fetch on the stored URL directly. The validatePublicHttpUrl helper in packages/backend/src/utils/ssrfProtection.ts, used for MCP server URLs, is not applied on either path, and the webhook fields carry no server-side URL constraint. A user able to create or trigger a scheduled delivery can therefore direct the server to issue POST requests to private, loopback and link-local addresses, including cloud metadata endpoints, and can distinguish reachable internal services from unreachable ones through the resulting errors. The upstream response is never returned to the requester; on a failure status its body is written to the server log instead. Version 1.146.4 routes both clients through postSchedulerWebhook from packages/backend/src/utils/schedulerWebhookValidation rather than calling fetch directly.
- Product
- lightdash
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 20, 2026The github-issue-bot templates in appwrite/templates verify the GitHub webhook signature with an inverted condition.CVE-2026-72861 · Other software · appwrite · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
The github-issue-bot templates in appwrite/templates verify the GitHub webhook signature with an inverted condition. verifyWebhook in node/github-issue-bot/src/github.js and in node-typescript/github-issue-bot/src/github.ts returns "typeof signature !== 'string' || (await verify(...))", so when the X-Hub-Signature-256 header is absent the first operand is true, the logical OR short-circuits, and the function reports success without performing any HMAC verification. main.js rejects a request only when verifyWebhook returns false, so an unauthenticated request carrying no signature passes the check. Processing then continues to postComment, which takes the repository and issue objects directly from the request body, letting the caller direct the deployed function to post a comment on a repository and issue of their choosing using the configured GITHUB_TOKEN, with the issue author login from the body interpolated into the comment text.
- Product
- templates
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 20, 2026The setWebhookResolver in packages/api/src/resolvers/webhooks/index.ts stores the caller-supplied url without any address validation, and the file imports no vaCVE-2026-77067 · Other software · omnivore-app · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
The setWebhookResolver in packages/api/src/resolvers/webhooks/index.ts stores the caller-supplied url without any address validation, and the file imports no validation helper. When a subscribed event fires, callWebhook in packages/api/src/jobs/call_webhook.ts issues axios.request with that url, the method and Content-Type recorded on the webhook, and a JSON body carrying the event data, so an authenticated user can make the server send repeated attacker-shaped requests to internal endpoints, including link-local metadata addresses. The request is blind: callWebhook discards the result and writes only a success line or the axios error to the server log, so the response is not returned through the API.
- Product
- omnivore
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 19, 2026Stigmem before 0.9.0a11 fails to validate the delivery_address parameter when creating webhook subscriptions, allowing authenticated users to specify internal lCVE-2026-76239 · Other software · eidetic-labs · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Stigmem before 0.9.0a11 fails to validate the delivery_address parameter when creating webhook subscriptions, allowing authenticated users to specify internal loopback and private network destinations. Attackers can trigger matching fact-change events to cause the Stigmem server to issue server-side HTTP POST requests to internal services, enabling blind SSRF attacks against localhost and private network endpoints.
- Product
- stigmem-node
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 18, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in AWX's webhook status callback mechanism.CVE-2026-71365 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 7.7
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in AWX's webhook status callback mechanism. When processing GitHub pull request webhooks, AWX extracts the status callback URL (pull_request.statuses_url) from the incoming webhook payload without validating the target host against the expected Git provider. This URL is persisted in job extra variables and later used to send authenticated status updates. A user with admin role on a webhook-enabled job template can read the template's webhook signing key, forge a signed GitHub webhook payload with an arbitrary statuses_url, and cause AWX to POST status updates to an attacker-controlled or internal URL. The status update request includes the configured Git Personal Access Token (PAT) in the Authorization header, resulting in credential leakage to the attacker-specified endpoint.
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaccess.redhat.comaccess.redhat.com
Aug 14, 2026A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler.CVE-2026-74244 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatMedium 5.9
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
- Product
- Red Hat OpenShift Update Service
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaccess.redhat.combugzilla.redhat.com
Aug 13, 2026Budibase before 3.40.0 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in webhook-triggered automations with EXECUTE_QUERY steps.CVE-2026-72851 · Other software · budibase · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9
Budibase before 3.40.0 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in webhook-triggered automations with EXECUTE_QUERY steps. Attackers can POST attacker-controlled JSON to the webhook trigger endpoint to inject SQL payloads that execute with builder-configured database credentials, enabling data exfiltration, modification, and persistence in connected datasources like Snowflake.
- Product
- server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 13, 2026Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via APICVE-2026-58511 · Other software · Gitea · reported by 88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2Low 2.7
Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API
- Product
- Gitea Open Source Git Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordblog.gitea.comgithub.com
Aug 13, 2026Webhooks created by a collaborator keep firing after their repo access is revoked → ongoing real-time exfiltration of private repo content (incomplete revocatioCVE-2026-58440 · Other software · Gitea · reported by 88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2Medium 6.8
Webhooks created by a collaborator keep firing after their repo access is revoked → ongoing real-time exfiltration of private repo content (incomplete revocation cleanup in `DeleteCollaboration`)
- Product
- Gitea Open Source Git Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordblog.gitea.comgithub.com
Aug 11, 2026Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-69223 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.1
Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Allura
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordallura.apache.orglists.apache.org
Aug 11, 2026An issue in usememos through v0.30.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Webhook validation mechanism iCVE-2026-51583 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 8.5
An issue in usememos through v0.30.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Webhook validation mechanism in internal/webhook/validate.go, by setting a webhook target to an internal address.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgist.github.comgithub.com
Aug 11, 2026An authenticated SSRF flaw was found in the OpenShift Console Dev Console webhook helpers.CVE-2026-50236 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 7.4
An authenticated SSRF flaw was found in the OpenShift Console Dev Console webhook helpers. User-supplied target URLs are fetched server-side without validation, with path neutralization enabling arbitrary endpoint targeting and full response reflection from the console pod's privileged network position.
- Product
- Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaccess.redhat.comaccess.redhat.com
Aug 10, 2026The webhook URL validator in `website/notifications/webhooks.py` uses `ip.is_global` to reject non-public addresses after DNS resolution.CVE-2026-72761 · Other software · vulnerability-lookup · reported by 5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8Medium 6.9
The webhook URL validator in `website/notifications/webhooks.py` uses `ip.is_global` to reject non-public addresses after DNS resolution. IPv6 transition addresses (NAT64 `64:ff9b::/96`, 6to4 `2002::/16`, Teredo `2001:0000::/32`) are classified as globally routable by IANA, so `is_global` returns `True` even when the embedded IPv4 targets a private, loopback, or cloud metadata destination. An attacker can register a webhook pointing at a hostname that resolves to a transition address to bypass the SSRF guard and exfiltrate vulnerability data to an internal endpoint. The vulnerability was introduced on a non-release version. The fix was already done on HEAD. It only affects organisation running the HEAD.
- Product
- vulnerability-lookup
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 7, 2026Grav CMS's scheduler-webhook plugin contains an authentication bypass in the webhook token check.CVE-2026-11430 · Other software · Trilby Media · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Grav CMS's scheduler-webhook plugin contains an authentication bypass in the webhook token check. When the webhook feature is enabled but no webhookToken is configured, a compound conditional short-circuits and skips token validation, so an unauthenticated remote attacker who can reach POST /scheduler/webhook can trigger the operator's already-configured scheduled jobs by sending a single request. The primitive is triggering-existing-jobs, not attacker-chosen command execution: the attacker controls when the jobs run and which one runs (via ?job=), but does not control what the jobs do. Code execution follows only when the operator has configured a job that shells out, and even then the attacker controls timing rather than payload. Not a default-install issue: reaching the endpoint requires the separate scheduler-webhook GPM plugin to be installed, scheduler.modern.webhook.enabled to be true (default false), and no webhookToken to be configured; a stock Grav or Grav-Admin install exposes nothing here.
- Product
- grav-plugin-scheduler-webhook
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 5, 2026Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin 16.v0cfa_f0215cf5 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison function when checking whether the provCVE-2026-70437 · Websites & servers · Jenkins Project · reported by jenkinsci-cert@googlegroups.comLow 3.7
Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin 16.v0cfa_f0215cf5 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook bearer token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook bearer token.
- Product
- Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 5, 2026Memos' webhook dispatch function safeDialContext (internal/webhook/webhook.go) resolves the target hostname via net.DefaultResolver.LookupHost and validates theCVE-2026-71272 · Other software · usememos · reported by 309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2cHigh 8.5
Memos' webhook dispatch function safeDialContext (internal/webhook/webhook.go) resolves the target hostname via net.DefaultResolver.LookupHost and validates the resulting IPs against reserved ranges, but then dials net.JoinHostPort(host, port) using the original hostname rather than the already-validated IP address.
- Product
- memos
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.