Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
9,162 results · page 13 of 184
Aug 28, 2026Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware.CVE-2026-82270 · Other software · Portkey-AI · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys.
- Product
- gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Qwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scCVE-2026-82268 · Other software · QwenLM · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Qwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scheme restriction or host validation. Attackers can reach the unauthenticated Gradio interface to make the server issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal addresses including metadata services and read retrieved content through parsed document output.
- Product
- Qwen-Agent
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OIDC SSO connector creation endpoint that fails to validate the issuer URL paraCVE-2026-82263 · Other software · logto-io · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OIDC SSO connector creation endpoint that fails to validate the issuer URL parameter. Tenant administrators with Management API credentials can supply arbitrary internal URLs to trigger HTTP GET requests to private network services, with response content returned in API responses.
- Product
- logto
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/hooks/:id/test endpoint that accepts arbitrary URLs without host valiCVE-2026-82262 · Other software · logto-io · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/hooks/:id/test endpoint that accepts arbitrary URLs without host validation. Tenant administrators with Management API tokens can make the server issue HTTP POST requests to internal URLs and retrieve response bodies from services on the private network.
- Product
- logto
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Everest Forms: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-5096 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.3
The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.4. This is due to the `load_previous_field_value()` method in `class-evf-form-task.php` accepting arbitrary URL values from `$_POST` data for upload fields without domain restriction, which are then passed to `wp_remote_head()` in the `get_local_file_size()` method of `class-evf-form-fields-upload.php`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force the WordPress server to make outbound HTTP HEAD requests to arbitrary URLs by submitting a form with an upload field containing a malicious URL while leaving a required field empty to trigger form re-rendering.
- Product
- Everest Forms
- Affected
- up to 3.4.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.4.4. Update Everest Forms to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Aug 28, 2026Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the query import endpoint that fails to validate user-supplied URLs beforeCVE-2026-82246 · Other software · budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the query import endpoint that fails to validate user-supplied URLs before fetching content. Attackers can submit arbitrary URLs to retrieve responses from internal services including cloud metadata endpoints and other restricted network resources.
- Product
- server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the datasource verify endpoint that allows builder-level users to supply aCVE-2026-82243 · Other software · budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the datasource verify endpoint that allows builder-level users to supply arbitrary URLs without SSRF validation. Attackers can exploit this to leak internal CouchDB credentials by making requests to attacker-controlled servers, gaining full database access in cloud deployments.
- Product
- server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026SiYuan versions before v3.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the http_request and web_fetch agent tools that perform DNS resolution onlyCVE-2026-82234 · Other software · siyuan-note · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
SiYuan versions before v3.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the http_request and web_fetch agent tools that perform DNS resolution only at guard time without validating the connect-time resolution. Attackers can use DNS rebinding to answer the guard resolution with a public IP and the connect resolution with a private or metadata IP, bypassing the SSRF defense to access cloud instance metadata and internal services.
- Product
- siyuan
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026WWBN AVideo through 30.0 (and master up to commit 4cb576e) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/myLiveControls.save.json.php.CVE-2026-81733 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
WWBN AVideo through 30.0 (and master up to commit 4cb576e) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/myLiveControls.save.json.php. The endpoint only checks that a user is logged in and processes customUrl, customMessage, and autoRedirect parameters from $_REQUEST via a GET request without enforcing a CSRF token or origin check. An attacker who lures a logged-in streamer to a malicious page can silently change the live-channel viewer-redirect settings (persisted in users.externalOptions), causing viewers to be redirected to a phishing site or shown a spoofed message.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitivCVE-2026-9491 · Network & remote access · Synology · reported by security@synology.comMedium 4.3
A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
- Product
- Synology Chat Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Database Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to CVE-2026-78500 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.1
A blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Database Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension FTP Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate eCVE-2026-78499 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.1
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension FTP Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Email Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerateCVE-2026-78498 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.1
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Email Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Remote Backup Connection Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker CVE-2026-78495 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.3
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Remote Backup Connection Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to sanitize the email field of imported identity documents, allowing attackers to inject ANSI escape sequences that forge theCVE-2026-81707 · Other software · jahlives · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to sanitize the email field of imported identity documents, allowing attackers to inject ANSI escape sequences that forge the fingerprint verification line displayed to users. Attackers can deliver a crafted identity bundle through normal contact-exchange flows or keyserver responses to manipulate terminal output and display a fraudulent fingerprint, bypassing the out-of-band verification mechanism that protects against key substitution attacks.
- Product
- openssl_encrypt
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 27, 2026AVideo before 24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to extract embedded IPv4 addresses from NAT64, CVE-2026-81678 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
AVideo before 24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to extract embedded IPv4 addresses from NAT64, 6to4, and Teredo IPv6 transition address formats. Unauthenticated attackers can bypass SSRF protections via the LiveLinks proxy endpoint to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints by encoding private IPv4 targets in transition address formats.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 27, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FluentBooking Pro <= 2.2.4 versions.CVE-2026-81273 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FluentBooking Pro <= 2.2.4 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.2.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.2.4. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 27, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.176 versions.CVE-2026-81271 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.176 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.8.176
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.8.176. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 27, 2026Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user wCVE-2026-77035 · Websites & servers · reported by security@joomla.orgMedium 5.1
Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user with edit-own rights (the eventowner=1 setting or core.edit.own) can POST another user's record id together with their own id as created_by and take over that record.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordjoomlaeventmanager.net
Aug 26, 2026The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgeCVE-2026-75340 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 26, 2026Zyplayer-Doc <=1.0.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via WikiPageWebService.download().CVE-2026-75332 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
Zyplayer-Doc <=1.0.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via WikiPageWebService.download().
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 26, 2026HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when an internal server is compromised possibly allowing an attacker to send unauthorized reCVE-2025-62341 · Other software · HCLSoftware · reported by psirt@hcl.comLow 3.7
HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when an internal server is compromised possibly allowing an attacker to send unauthorized requests in certain scenarios leading to information disclosure or security bypass.
- Product
- Connections
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordsupport.hcl-software.com
Aug 26, 2026Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-71172 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 4.3
Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
- Product
- Cloud Disaster Recovery
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 26, 2026Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lime Technology, Inc.'s Unraid OS version 6.12.14 and earlier allows remote attackers to escalate privileges CVE-2025-56798 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 8.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lime Technology, Inc.'s Unraid OS version 6.12.14 and earlier allows remote attackers to escalate privileges via the Unraid authentication cookie's lax same-site policy.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordalittleinsecure.comalittleinsecure.com
Aug 26, 2026Nagios Core before 4.5.12 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in cmd.cgi where the CSRF protection mechanism passes validation when the NagFormICVE-2026-48548 · Other software · Nagios Enterprises, LLC. · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Nagios Core before 4.5.12 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in cmd.cgi where the CSRF protection mechanism passes validation when the NagFormId cookie is absent. Attackers can craft a malicious cross-site POST request to execute arbitrary Nagios commands as a currently authenticated user without their knowledge or consent.
- Product
- Nagios Core
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 25, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of tCVE-2026-76193 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 10
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- Adobe Campaign Classic
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 25, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng, the Ansible Galaxy server plugin for Pulp.CVE-2026-79717 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatMedium 6.4
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng, the Ansible Galaxy server plugin for Pulp. An authenticated user with namespace management permissions can set a namespace avatar URL to an arbitrary address, including internal networks, loopback, or cloud instance metadata endpoints. A background worker fetches that URL without checking the destination, which lets the attacker probe internal services and enumerate reachable IP addresses. The HTTP client is also configured without an overall timeout, so a slow or non-responsive target can pin workers and cause a denial of service.
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaccess.redhat.combugzilla.redhat.com
Aug 25, 2026Ech0 before 4.4.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the validateWebhookURL function (webhook_setting_service.go), which only validates litCVE-2026-79671 · Other software · lin-snow · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
Ech0 before 4.4.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the validateWebhookURL function (webhook_setting_service.go), which only validates literal IP addresses via net.ParseIP() and fails to reject hostnames that DNS-resolve to private or internal IPs (e.g., 169.254.169.254.nip.io). An attacker with admin privileges can create a webhook with such a hostname to bypass validation and cause the server to make requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and private network resources. The issue is fixed in 4.4.3.
- Product
- Ech0
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 25, 2026Ech0 before 4.7.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the fetchPeerConnectInfo function that uses unvalidated HTTP requests instead of safe CVE-2026-79659 · Other software · lin-snow · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Ech0 before 4.7.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the fetchPeerConnectInfo function that uses unvalidated HTTP requests instead of safe request methods with URL validation. Authenticated attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to access internal services and cloud metadata endpoints by triggering connection health checks or peer connection operations.
- Product
- Ech0
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 25, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Avro SerDe schema resolution in Apache Hive before 4.2.1 allows an authenticated remote attacker with CREATE TABLE privileCVE-2026-55976 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Avro SerDe schema resolution in Apache Hive before 4.2.1 allows an authenticated remote attacker with CREATE TABLE privilege to cause the Hive server to fetch an attacker-controlled URL when resolving the avro.schema.url table property on an Avro table that is subsequently queried. This can expose cloud instance metadata, internal network services, or local server files to the Hive process identity. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.2.1, which fixes this issue. Attacker access requirements: * Network access to HiveServer2 / Metastore: required (remote attacker model). * Valid Hive authentication: required. * CREATE TABLE (or equivalent) privilege: required, so the attacker can set avro.schema.url in table properties. * SELECT privilege on the malicious table: not required for the creator, who can typically query their own table; any other user granted SELECT can also trigger the fetch. * Write access to the table LOCATION: not required; the attack uses the schema URL, not the data path. * Admin / superuser privileges: not required; an ordinary authenticated user with DDL rights is sufficient. * External tabl
- Product
- Apache Hive
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 25, 2026The extension forces empty frontend-group and subpage-inheritance restrictions onto page records during indexer sub-requests, and this forged state was persisteCVE-2026-56092 · Other software · TYPO3 · reported by f4fb688c-4412-4426-b4b8-421ecf27b14aHigh 7.6
The extension forces empty frontend-group and subpage-inheritance restrictions onto page records during indexer sub-requests, and this forged state was persisted into the shared rootline cache, allowing anonymous visitors to bypass extendToSubpages-inherited access restrictions on cached pages.
- Product
- Extension "Apache Solr for TYPO3 - Enterprise Search"
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 24, 2026NLTK before 3.10.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (and callers nltk.data.load, nltk.downloader.Downloader.index/doCVE-2026-78682 · Other software · nltk · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
NLTK before 3.10.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (and callers nltk.data.load, nltk.downloader.Downloader.index/download) when an HTTP proxy is configured. pathsec.urlopen validates the requested hostname locally, but proxy-handler inheritance disables the safe HTTP/HTTPS handlers so the actual fetch is performed by the proxy against a destination that is never re-validated. An attacker can supply a validated public URL that the proxy forwards to an internal loopback-only service, allowing disclosure of internal HTTP resources, loading of forged downloader indexes, and installation of attacker-chosen package content.
- Product
- nltk
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 24, 2026Grav API plugin before 1.0.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in webhook delivery that allows attackers to bypass hostname validation by DNCVE-2026-56708 · Other software · getgrav · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Grav API plugin before 1.0.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in webhook delivery that allows attackers to bypass hostname validation by DNS rebinding. Attackers controlling authoritative DNS for a configured webhook hostname can answer validation lookups with public addresses and delivery lookups with private addresses to reach internal network resources.
- Product
- grav
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 24, 2026Adminer before 5.5.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the login form's server field validator, which only inspects leading integers for pCVE-2026-34964 · Other software · vrana · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Adminer before 5.5.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the login form's server field validator, which only inspects leading integers for privileged ports and fails to reject non-numeric port values. Attackers can inject PDO DSN keys like host= and port= into the server parameter to bypass the privileged-port restriction and establish TCP connections to arbitrary internal hosts and ports before authentication.
- Product
- adminer
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 24, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in multiple AWX notification backends.CVE-2026-71366 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 7.7
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in multiple AWX notification backends. The webhook, Mattermost, Rocket.Chat, and Grafana notification backends use notification template URLs as direct HTTP request targets without validating the target address against private, loopback, or reserved IP ranges. An organization notification administrator can create notification templates pointing to internal or loopback addresses, causing the AWX control node to issue HTTP requests to services that are not externally accessible. Additionally, the webhook notification backend follows HTTP redirects and resends configured Basic Authentication credentials to redirect targets regardless of host change, allowing an attacker to exfiltrate notification credentials by redirecting to an attacker-controlled host. The Grafana backend sends its API key in the Authorization header to the configured target URL.
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaccess.redhat.comaccess.redhat.com
Aug 24, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Hash Form <= 1.4.0 versions.CVE-2026-78280 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 4.3
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Hash Form <= 1.4.0 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.4.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.4.0. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 24, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Fluent Support Pro <= 2.3.1 versions.CVE-2026-78279 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Fluent Support Pro <= 2.3.1 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.3.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.3.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 24, 2026Subscriber Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in FluentCRM Pro <= 3.1.12 versions.CVE-2026-78277 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 4.9
Subscriber Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in FluentCRM Pro <= 3.1.12 versions.
- Affected
- up to 3.1.12
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.1.12. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 24, 2026Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Shared Files <= 1.7.69 versions.CVE-2026-78269 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.4
Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Shared Files <= 1.7.69 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.7.69
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.7.69. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 22, 2026NLTK before 3.10.0 (affected versions <= 3.9.4) contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the validate_network_url() function in nltk/pathsCVE-2026-63311 · Other software · nltk · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
NLTK before 3.10.0 (affected versions <= 3.9.4) contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the validate_network_url() function in nltk/pathsec.py. The _resolve_hostname() helper catches OSError and ValueError during socket.getaddrinfo() and returns an empty list; when DNS resolution fails, the validation loop executes no IP checks and the function fails open, allowing urlopen() to proceed without validation. An attacker who can trigger DNS resolution failures or use DNS rebinding can bypass SSRF protections and reach restricted network resources, including cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254).
- Product
- nltk
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 22, 2026Punk versions before 0.18 for Perl allow session cookie forgery via an empty default HMAC key when a session is declared without a secret.CVE-2026-75870 · Other software · reported by 9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441eCritical 9.1
Punk versions before 0.18 for Perl allow session cookie forgery via an empty default HMAC key when a session is declared without a secret. The session keyword freezes its options onto the application as given: it does not require a secret, warn, or refuse to start when one is absent. The cookie read and the write-back both default that key to the empty string, so a declaration with no secret option, or with an undefined or empty one, signs and verifies with a zero-length HMAC-SHA256 key. An attacker who knows the cookie format can then mint one offline carrying any contents the session holds, such as a user identifier or a role. Nothing marks the misconfiguration at runtime: cookies are well formed and sessions round-trip as expected.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordmetacpan.orgmetacpan.org
Aug 22, 2026WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the releaseVideoNow.json.php endpoint that lacks authenticity checks CVE-2026-58003 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the releaseVideoNow.json.php endpoint that lacks authenticity checks and accepts GET requests. Attackers can craft a malicious cross-site GET request carrying an administrator's session cookie to permanently publish any embargoed video by manipulating the videos_id parameter.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 22, 2026WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in objects/videoEditLight.php that lacks request authenticity checks andCVE-2026-58001 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in objects/videoEditLight.php that lacks request authenticity checks and accepts GET requests. Attackers can store an img tag in a video description that transfers video ownership to an attacker-controlled account when an administrator views the video page.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 22, 2026AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in channelToGallery.json.php that allows attackers to modify site-wide GallerCVE-2026-57944 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in channelToGallery.json.php that allows attackers to modify site-wide Gallery configuration by performing unauthorized writes to plugin data. Attackers can craft a cross-site GET request carrying an administrator's session cookie to promote arbitrary channels to the front page or delete curated sections without token validation.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 22, 2026Mailgun for: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVE-2026-78003 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceCritical 9.8
The Mailgun for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via path traversal in versions up to and including 2.2.0. This is due to insufficient input validation in the add_list() function, which accepts user-controlled array keys from $_POST['addresses'], passes them through sanitize_text_field(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make authenticated POST requests to any Mailgun API endpoint using the WordPress site's API key, including creating inbound email-forwarding routes that can intercept password reset emails, leading to administrator account takeover.
- Product
- Mailgun for
- Affected
- up to 2.2.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.2.0. Update Mailgun for to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Aug 21, 2026Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure SQL Database allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.CVE-2026-69502 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comCritical 10
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure SQL Database allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
- Product
- Azure SQL Database
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 21, 2026OpenViking before 0.3.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to access internal network servicCVE-2026-22681 · Other software · Volcengine · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
OpenViking before 0.3.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to access internal network services by submitting arbitrary URLs to the resources API endpoint. Attackers can POST a crafted URL to /api/v1/resources, causing the server to issue outbound HEAD and GET requests with redirects enabled to loopback, RFC 1918, link-local, or cloud metadata addresses, then read back responses through normal content APIs to enumerate and interact with internal services.
- Product
- OpenViking
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 21, 2026Certificate validation failures in SAML authentication in Apache CloudStack 4.20.3.0 and 4.22.1.0 on all platforms allow a malicious agent to forge a SAML respoCVE-2026-68745 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.1
Certificate validation failures in SAML authentication in Apache CloudStack 4.20.3.0 and 4.22.1.0 on all platforms allow a malicious agent to forge a SAML response to the management server. The agent will have to spoof the ip address of the IdP or get an url of its own choosing registered in the management server, after which it can allow logging on with forged signatures. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 and above, which fix this issue.
- Product
- Apache CloudStack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 21, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's webhook module, exploitable via webhook delivery requests.CVE-2026-59085 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's webhook module, exploitable via webhook delivery requests. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.20.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache CloudStack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 20, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM.CVE-2026-77646 · Other software · PTC · reported by 0b655efc-079c-4cb9-9e8d-164871239f4eHigh 7.7
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.
- Product
- Windchill PDMLink
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.