Updated 6 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,766exploited flaws on CISA’s list

36added in the last 30 days

544new WordPress flaws this week

391,181entries in the database

9,162 results · page 12 of 184

Sep 4, 2026Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-80181 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.1
Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue affects Apache Allura: through 1.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
Product
Apache Allura
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record lists.apache.org openwall.com
Sep 3, 2026Missing Authentication for Critical Function, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), and Use of Hard-coded Credentials in ASUS Control Center allow an unauthorizedCVE-2026-75754 · Network & remote access · ASUS · reported by 54bf65a7-a193-42d2-b1ba-8e150d3c35e1Critical 10
Missing Authentication for Critical Function, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), and Use of Hard-coded Credentials in ASUS Control Center allow an unauthorized user to obtain the encryption key via an HTTP request, causing a local service to enable SSH on port 2222. The attacker can then log in with the hardcode credentials to obtain a root shell, enabling direct reading, writing, and deletion of data on ASUS Control Center, as well as remote control of all servers, PCs, and workstations within the company. Refer to the 'Security Update for ASUS Control Center' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.
Product
Control Center Enterprise (ACC)
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record asus.com
Sep 3, 2026Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Power Automate allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.CVE-2026-65818 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 8.5
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Power Automate allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Product
Microsoft Power Platform
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record msrc.microsoft.com
Sep 3, 2026node-forge through 1.4.0 fails to validate element count in nested DigestAlgorithm sequences during RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification.CVE-2026-85393 · Other software · digitalbazaar · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
node-forge through 1.4.0 fails to validate element count in nested DigestAlgorithm sequences during RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Attackers can embed garbage bytes inside the DigestAlgorithm sequence to forge valid signatures for arbitrary messages using low-exponent RSA keys. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-33894.
Product
forge
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 3, 2026Peppermint through 0.5.5 contains a hardcoded JWT signing secret in docker-compose.yml that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge session tokens for any accCVE-2026-85391 · Other software · Peppermint-Lab · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
Peppermint through 0.5.5 contains a hardcoded JWT signing secret in docker-compose.yml that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge session tokens for any account. Attackers can use the published secret to mint valid tokens for arbitrary user IDs and access protected endpoints without credentials.
Product
peppermint
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 3, 2026SEOPress: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVE-2026-85305 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SEOPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects SEOPress: from n/a through 10.1.
Product
SEOPress
Affected
up to 10.1
What to do
Affects up to 10.1. Update SEOPress to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 3, 2026PlaywrightCapture contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its favicon retrieval functionality.CVE-2026-85242 · Other software · Lookyloo · reported by 5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8Medium 6.9
PlaywrightCapture contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its favicon retrieval functionality. When only_global_lookup is enabled, the application validates the initial favicon URL to prevent requests to localhost, loopback, or other non-public network addresses. However, redirects followed by aiohttp were not subjected to the same validation. An attacker able to influence the content of a page processed by PlaywrightCapture could specify a publicly reachable favicon URL that responds with an HTTP redirect to a local or otherwise restricted address, such as 127.0.0.1, localhost, or an internal network service. Because aiohttp automatically followed the redirect, the resulting request could bypass the application's local-address restrictions and cause the PlaywrightCapture host to issue HTTP requests to resources that should not be externally reachable. Depending on the services reachable from the PlaywrightCapture host and how retrieved favicon data is subsequently exposed or processed, this could be used to probe internal HTTP services or potentially obtain information from otherwise inaccessible endpoints. The patch introduces an aiohttp request middl
Product
PlaywrightCapture
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com
Sep 3, 2026Subscriber Privilege Escalation in Bricksforge <= 3.1.8.8 versions.CVE-2026-84814 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackCritical 9.8
Subscriber Privilege Escalation in Bricksforge <= 3.1.8.8 versions.
Affected
up to 3.1.8.8
What to do
Affects up to 3.1.8.8. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 3, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in LiteSpeed Cache <= 7.9 versions.CVE-2026-84761 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.2
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in LiteSpeed Cache <= 7.9 versions.
Affected
up to 7.9
What to do
Affects up to 7.9. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 3, 2026A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability existed in the cullEmptyEvents action of MISP.CVE-2026-85236 · Other software · misp · reported by 5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8High 8.8
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability existed in the cullEmptyEvents action of MISP. The endpoint performed a state-changing and irreversible operation while accepting HTTP GET requests. Because bodyless GET requests are not subject to CakePHP's CSRF validation, an attacker could cause an authenticated MISP user with sufficient privileges to invoke the endpoint simply by causing their browser to load a crafted URL, for example through an embedded image or other automatically requested resource. Successful exploitation triggers the deletion of published empty events. The deletion is particularly significant because the operation uses skipBlocklist, meaning the removed events do not leave blocklist entries that could prevent or track their subsequent synchronization. This can result in unintended and potentially irreversible deletion of MISP event records without explicit user interaction. The vulnerability was addressed by restricting cullEmptyEvents to HTTP POST requests, ensuring that CakePHP's normal CSRF protections are applied to the operation.
Product
misp
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 3, 2026CAT uses Java String.hashCode as the sole integrity check for session cookies without server-side keying, allowing attackers to forge valid checksums offline.CVE-2026-85181 · Other software · dianping · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
CAT uses Java String.hashCode as the sole integrity check for session cookies without server-side keying, allowing attackers to forge valid checksums offline. Attackers can set the x-forwarded-for header to bypass IP binding validation and create admin sessions with full configuration access.
Product
cat
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 3, 2026n8n versions before 2.34.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the legacy request helper function exposed to Code and Function nodes.CVE-2026-85172 · Other software · n8n-io · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
n8n versions before 2.34.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the legacy request helper function exposed to Code and Function nodes. The validation logic checks the uri property for SSRF safety while the underlying HTTP client uses the url property when both are present, allowing attackers to bypass validation by supplying a safe uri alongside a malicious url to access internal addresses.
Product
n8n
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 3, 2026WWBN AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the set_api_userImages API endpoint that fails to validate profileICVE-2026-85164 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
WWBN AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the set_api_userImages API endpoint that fails to validate profileImg and backgroundImg URLs before fetching them. Authenticated API clients can supply internal URLs to fetch cloud metadata or internal services, with responses written to publicly accessible web paths for retrieval.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 3, 2026AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the EPG parser that allows authenticated uploaders to fetch arbitrary inCVE-2026-85163 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the EPG parser that allows authenticated uploaders to fetch arbitrary internal URLs. An attacker can supply an internal URL via the epg_link parameter during video upload, which is validated only for syntax and later fetched server-side during EPG generation without SSRF protection checks.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 3, 2026AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/saveLive.php that lacks forbidIfNotPost and forbidIfInvalidToCVE-2026-85162 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/saveLive.php that lacks forbidIfNotPost and forbidIfInvalidToken protections. Attackers can craft malicious image tags to overwrite authenticated streamers' RTMP keys, passwords, and titles, hijacking live broadcasts.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 3, 2026AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in removePoster.php that lacks forbidIfNotPost or forbidIfInvalidToken checkCVE-2026-85161 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in removePoster.php that lacks forbidIfNotPost or forbidIfInvalidToken checks. Attackers can craft malicious image tags to delete authenticated victims' live poster and thumbnail files via GET requests.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 3, 2026AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a cross-site request forgery and path traversal vulnerability in stopLive.php that allows attackers to delete directoriCVE-2026-85160 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a cross-site request forgery and path traversal vulnerability in stopLive.php that allows attackers to delete directories by exploiting missing token validation and unsanitized key parameter concatenation. Attackers can craft an image tag with a traversal payload like key=../../videos to trigger recursive deletion of the videos directory when an admin visits a malicious page.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 3, 2026Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unauthenticated PayPal callback forgery leading to order confirmation fraud in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1CVE-2026-77999 · Websites & servers · reported by security@joomla.orgHigh 8.7
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unauthenticated PayPal callback forgery leading to order confirmation fraud in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - The PayPal IPN listener's signature check (`_validateIPN()`) accepted `UNVERIFIED` and any non-`INVALID` response as valid, made its verification request with `CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER` disabled, and stored its verdict in a field nothing downstream ever checked — so processing continued regardless of the outcome. Separately, the paid-amount comparison only ran when `mc_gross` was a positive number; omitting the field from the POST body (`floatval(null) == 0`) skipped the check entirely. Combined with a merchant-configured `receiver_email` and a sequential, enumerable order id read from the `custom` field, an anonymous POST was enough to move a pending order straight to `CONFIRMED` with no payment, or force another customer's pending order to `FAILED`. `paypalv2.php` performed no amount check under any circumstances.
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record j2commerce.com
Sep 3, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /ocsreports/?function=tele_activate endpoint due to insufficient validation of the HTTPS_SERV and FILE_SCVE-2026-76177 · Other software · OCS Inventory NG · reported by cve-coordination@incibe.esHigh 7.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /ocsreports/?function=tele_activate endpoint due to insufficient validation of the HTTPS_SERV and FILE_SERV parameters. An authenticated user with operator privileges can provide arbitrary values for these parameters, causing the OCS Inventory server to make HTTP/HTTPS requests to external systems or internal resources, which could allow access to internal network services or metadata resources of cloud services.
Product
Ocsreports
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record incibe.es
Sep 3, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, versions 20.2.0.0 and below, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the REST API.CVE-2026-74768 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 4.1
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, versions 20.2.0.0 and below, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the REST API. A high privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure.
Product
PowerProtect Data Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 2, 2026A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Libraries Plugin 798.v5cc688825312 and earlier allows attackers to delete shared lCVE-2026-84663 · Websites & servers · Jenkins Project · reported by jenkinsci-cert@googlegroups.comMedium 5.4
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Libraries Plugin 798.v5cc688825312 and earlier allows attackers to delete shared library caches.
Product
Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Libraries Plugin
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record jenkins.io
Sep 2, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Entity Share Websub allows Server Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-73474 · Websites & servers · reported by mlhess@drupal.orgMedium 5.3
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Entity Share Websub allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Entity Share Websub versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.2.
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record drupal.org
Sep 2, 2026Editor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Broken Link Checker <= 2.4.14 versions.CVE-2026-84772 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.5
Editor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Broken Link Checker <= 2.4.14 versions.
Affected
up to 2.4.14
What to do
Affects up to 2.4.14. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 2, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Mang Board WP <= 2.3.8 versions.CVE-2026-84770 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Mang Board WP <= 2.3.8 versions.
Affected
up to 2.3.8
What to do
Affects up to 2.3.8. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 2, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simply Schedule Appointments <= 1.6.12.23 versions.CVE-2026-84764 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simply Schedule Appointments <= 1.6.12.23 versions.
Affected
up to 1.6.12.23
What to do
Affects up to 1.6.12.23. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 2, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Activity Log <= 2.13.1 versions.CVE-2026-84759 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Activity Log <= 2.13.1 versions.
Affected
up to 2.13.1
What to do
Affects up to 2.13.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 2, 2026Grand Tour: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVE-2026-66652 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Tour allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Grand Tour: from n/a through 5.5.1.
Product
Grand Tour
Affected
up to 5.5.1
What to do
Affects up to 5.5.1. Update Grand Tour to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 1, 2026WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get_domain() and isSameDomain() functions that fail to properly vCVE-2026-84482 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get_domain() and isSameDomain() functions that fail to properly validate referer origins. Attackers can forge requests from sibling subdomains or unparseable long-gTLD origins to perform administrative ObjectYPT writes including live server configuration changes.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances Server-Side Request Forgery VulnerabilityCVE-2026-83548 · Network & remote access · SonicWall · reported by PSIRT@sonicwall.comExploitedCritical 10
SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive functionality and perform unauthorized operations.
Product
SMA1000 Appliances
On CISA’s list since
Sep 2, 2026 (federal fix deadline Sep 5, 2026)
What to do
Attackers are using this now. Install SonicWall’s update today. If there is no update for your version, take the product off the internet or stop using it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record CISA catalog psirt.global.sonicwall.com cisa.gov
Sep 1, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed remote code execution on the instance.CVE-2026-76851 · Other software · GitHub · reported by product-cna@github.comHigh 7.7
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed remote code execution on the instance. Insufficient network isolation allowed malicious pre-receive hook code to impersonate an internal service and redirect trusted internal requests to a privileged service, leading to elevated code execution. Exploitation required pre-receive hook networking to be enabled and either site administrator privileges or write access to a repository containing a configured pre-receive hook. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.17.20, 3.18.14, 3.19.11, 3.20.7, and 3.21.5. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Product
Enterprise Server
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.github.com docs.github.com
Sep 1, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause the Manage API tCVE-2026-18730 · Other software · GitHub · reported by product-cna@github.comHigh 8.2
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause the Manage API to send crafted outbound requests to an attacker-controlled host. An unauthenticated endpoint parsed an attacker-supplied cluster configuration and issued gateway-to-agent requests whose HMAC authenticated only a timestamp, not the request path or body. An attacker positioned to intercept the outbound request could capture this token and replay it against privileged management agent endpoints. High-availability deployments were not affected due to a topology restriction. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server releases in the 3.17, 3.18, 3.19, 3.20, and 3.21 series and was fixed in versions 3.17.21, 3.18.15, 3.19.12, 3.20.8, and 3.21.6. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Product
Enterprise Server
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.github.com docs.github.com
Sep 1, 2026A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX switches exposes some sessions to a lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection.CVE-2026-73780 · Other software · Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) · reported by security-alert@hpe.comHigh 8.3
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX switches exposes some sessions to a lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. This could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary input against the affected interface if the attacker can convince an authenticated user of the interface to interact with a specially crafted URL.
Product
AOS-CX
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.hpe.com
Sep 1, 2026A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX could allow an authenticated remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attCVE-2026-73757 · Other software · Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) · reported by security-alert@hpe.comMedium 6.4
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX could allow an authenticated remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. A successful exploit allows an attacker to enumerate information about the internal structure of the AOS-CX host, leading to potential disclosure and limited modification of sensitive information.
Product
AOS-CX
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.hpe.com
Sep 1, 2026Wyoming before 1.10.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers with network access to force outbound connectioCVE-2026-8712 · Other software · OHF-Voice · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Wyoming before 1.10.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers with network access to force outbound connections to arbitrary targets by supplying a malicious `uri` query parameter to the HTTP API. Attackers can pass arbitrary `tcp://` or `unix://` URIs to affected endpoints including /api/info, /api/speech-to-text, and /api/text-to-speech to override the server-configured backend and redirect connections to attacker-chosen hosts.
Product
wyoming
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd.CVE-2026-18780 · Other software · TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trHigh 7.1
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16.
Product
Talassoft Industrial Management Software
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record siberguvenlik.gov.tr
Sep 1, 2026Kyverno before 1.16.2 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the APICall feature.CVE-2026-84199 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Kyverno before 1.16.2 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the APICall feature. The URL field in a Policy's ServiceCall configuration is not validated, so a user with namespace-level Policy creation permissions can direct Kyverno to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal resources (e.g., cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254 or other tenants' resources). Because Kyverno executes these requests using its cluster-wide high-privilege ServiceAccount (a Confused Deputy problem), the responses—potentially including other tenants' secrets and cloud IAM credentials—are returned in the PolicyReport and can be read by the attacker, breaking multi-tenant isolation.
Product
kyverno
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026Kyverno before 1.18.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in apiCall.service.url that allows authenticated users to send arbitrary HTTP requestCVE-2026-84196 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Kyverno before 1.18.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in apiCall.service.url that allows authenticated users to send arbitrary HTTP requests by injecting user-controlled input through variable substitution. Attackers can target internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and loopback addresses, with response data reflected in admission error messages enabling non-blind data exfiltration.
Product
kyverno
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/API/set.json.php that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions by crafting GET reCVE-2026-83595 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/API/set.json.php that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions by crafting GET requests that bypass CSRF protection. Attackers can navigate a victim's browser to a malicious URL with API parameters to delete videos, deactivate accounts, or modify playlists without user interaction.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026Kyverno before v1.13.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via its Service Call functionality.CVE-2025-15613 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Kyverno before v1.13.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via its Service Call functionality. An attacker with permission to create Kyverno (Cluster)Policies can specify an external URL in a policy's apiCall/service configuration; although Service Call is documented for in-cluster services, it also resolves external addresses, allowing requests to an attacker-controlled server. Because policy context data (including contents of Kubernetes resources such as secrets) is sent in these requests, an attacker can exfiltrate sensitive cluster data.
Product
kyverno
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Aug 31, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in MapSVG <= 8.15.0 versions.CVE-2026-82852 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in MapSVG <= 8.15.0 versions.
Affected
up to 8.15.0
What to do
Affects up to 8.15.0. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Aug 31, 2026Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the /har/test endpoint in QD 20220208 through 20250803.CVE-2026-51152 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the /har/test endpoint in QD 20220208 through 20250803. Fetcher.build_request() in libs/fetcher.py constructs an httpclient.HTTPRequest from user-supplied JSON without validating URL scheme, host, or IP range. The /har/test handler does not require authentication, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to force the QD server to send arbitrary HTTP requests to internal network resources and cloud metadata endpoints. validate_cert is set to False, disabling TLS verification.
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record gist.github.com qd-today.github.io
Aug 31, 2026ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy juCVE-2026-71378 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgMedium 4.6
ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy judges to come from another origin. Its default policy, FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy, was derived from a reference implementation written to guard static resources, and it inherited two allowances that are unsafe when the thing being guarded is an action on a page: * Every "simple top-level navigation" was allowed. Any GET request carrying Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate whose Sec-Fetch-Dest was neither object nor embed was allowed, whatever Sec-Fetch-Site said — including cross-site. Wicket invokes component listeners (Link.onClick(), form submits, behaviour callbacks) through ordinary GET navigations, so a page under an attacker's control could navigate the victim's browser to a listener URL and have that listener run inside the victim's authenticated session. Browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies — the effective default when no SameSite attribute is set — on cross-site top-level GET navigations, so the victim's session cookie accompanied the request. * Sec-Fetch-Site: same-site was allowed unconditionally. That value me
Product
Apache Wicket
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record lists.apache.org openwall.com
Aug 31, 2026@pdfme/common before 5.5.10 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the getB64BasePdf function that fetches arbitrary URLs without validation whCVE-2026-82866 · Other software · pdfme · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.9
@pdfme/common before 5.5.10 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the getB64BasePdf function that fetches arbitrary URLs without validation when basePdf is attacker-controlled. Attackers who control the basePdf template field can force servers or clients to make requests to internal endpoints, enabling metadata exfiltration, network reconnaissance, and blind request forgery attacks.
Product
common
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Aug 30, 2026A vulnerability was found in Forgejo up to 15.0.4.CVE-2026-82556 · Other software · reported by VulDBLow 2.1
A vulnerability was found in Forgejo up to 15.0.4. This issue affects the function net.LookupIP of the file services/migrations/allowlist/is_migrate_allowed.go of the component Repository Migration Handler. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The patch is named b313bb83f5ff22bcc0378e0e0ca7bbd58303f168. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The project maintainer explains: "I don't intend to backport this to v15 or v16 as it is a breaking change."
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record codeberg.org codeberg.org
Aug 30, 2026WWBN AVideo contains a server-side request forgery filter bypass vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to normalize NAT64 addresses written in CVE-2026-82648 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
WWBN AVideo contains a server-side request forgery filter bypass vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to normalize NAT64 addresses written in hexadecimal form. Attackers can bypass SSRF protections by supplying hex-encoded NAT64 addresses like 64:ff9b::a9fe:a9fe to reach cloud metadata services and loopback interfaces.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Aug 30, 2026WWBN AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in sendEmail.json.php that allows authenticated administrators to send mail from the site's contCVE-2026-82647 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
WWBN AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in sendEmail.json.php that allows authenticated administrators to send mail from the site's contact address by bypassing origin checks and captcha validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that, when visited by an authenticated admin, sends emails with attacker-controlled subject and body to arbitrary recipients, passing SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation for phishing and brand impersonation attacks.
Product
AVideo
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Aug 30, 2026jina-ai reader disables its private-address guard outside Google Cloud deployments, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery.CVE-2026-82638 · Other software · jina-ai · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
jina-ai reader disables its private-address guard outside Google Cloud deployments, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery. Attackers can supply publicly resolvable hostnames mapping to private addresses to retrieve cloud metadata and internal service content.
Product
reader
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Aug 29, 2026Rodauth before 2.47.0 contains a cross-site request forgery protection bypass vulnerability in the JSON request content type validation.CVE-2026-82468 · Other software · jeremyevans · reported by VulnCheckMedium 4.9
Rodauth before 2.47.0 contains a cross-site request forgery protection bypass vulnerability in the JSON request content type validation. Attackers can craft cross-origin form posts with content types containing application/json substrings to bypass CSRF token validation and force victims to authenticate to attacker-controlled accounts.
Product
rodauth
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Aug 28, 2026IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-18545 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 4.3
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
Product
Langflow OSS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Aug 28, 2026bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication CVE-2026-82285 · Other software · dataelement · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.8
bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication and applies no URL scheme restrictions or host filtering. Unauthenticated attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to enumerate internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints, then retrieve captured responses from object storage using caller-supplied object names.
Product
bisheng
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.